Apparently I’m not quite done with the topic of submitting…
river bridge
the leaf before
the leaf after
Looking at my submissions, it’s quite clear: I send a better selection of poems, when I have built a real connection with the journal’s mission and their editors. Full stop.
It’s about trust. No careful, long curation is pivotal for me. It’s emotions. That’s fascinating!
revisiting squirrels next spring
Emotions have a big influence on why we do what we do. I believe people are generally more inclined to send their best work when they feel safe doing so.
When do I feel safe? When a journal seems open, honest, friendly, communicative and personal. When there is literally a person to connect with.
closing a ring cairn repetends
If that’s true, then perhaps what the journals get to see of the poets is not representative of their full range and abilities. I keep wondering how we can bring all the hidden treasures in fellow poets’ notes out into the wild! I wonder if this trust between poets and editors might come close to the function of a muse….

stepping-stones
this morning
thinly iced
And when a rejection letter is sent, the balance of trust must be restored as best as possible…
mypoemtooshortcomingforthemoon
And I really want my poems being read. I want people to feel them.
raising their handsome point taken
I don’t have a definitive answer, maybe there isn’t just one…
Poets! Share your good experiences, what helps you to entrust your best haiku to a magazine?
Editors! What do you think is helpful to maintain and establish the connection?
Leave a reply to pi & anne Cancel reply